<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Full Launch &#187; Off Track &#8211; Chris&#8217;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fulllaunch.com/?cat=7&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fulllaunch.com</link>
	<description>News, Analysis, and Reflections on the Amusement Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=16</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 06:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>csladky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off Track - Chris's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a roller coaster today that I thought was interesting enough to share, mostly because it was actually in North America, and most roller coasters like it are in Asia. Called Sky Streak, it was a Sansei Yusoki Co. coaster, and it&#8217;s very similar to what we&#8217;ve seen from Golden Horse, Beijing Shibaolai, Senyo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a roller coaster today that I thought was interesting enough to share, mostly because it was actually in North America, and most roller coasters like it are in Asia. Called Sky Streak, it was a Sansei Yusoki Co. coaster, and it&#8217;s very similar to what we&#8217;ve seen from Golden Horse, Beijing Shibaolai, Senyo Kogyo, Togo, etc.</p>
<p>Among the more amusing parts of it are <a href="http://rcdb.com/636.htm?p=18156" target="_blank">the super-angular lift hill</a>,Â  <a href="http://rcdb.com/636.htm?p=18164" target="_blank">a turnaround</a> that appears to completely lack any banking whatsoever (and is followed by a laughably abrupt transition), <a href="http://rcdb.com/636.htm?p=18166" target="_blank">a bunch of great transitions at the tops of its hills</a> (ouch!),Â  and what was probably <a href="http://rcdb.com/636.htm?p=18167" target="_blank">the most entertaining part of the layout</a>.</p>
<p>With some coasters, it&#8217;s just more fun to make fun of them than ride them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=16</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kind of&#8230;a Bummer.</title>
		<link>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=11</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 04:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>csladky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off Track - Chris's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a chance to go to California next weekend, which is sort of a great opportunity&#8230;except nothing&#8217;s open yet. What gives, California?! At least I have another opportunity to go back in June. It certainly is an exciting year for California, though; here&#8217;s what we&#8217;ll have to look forward to:

Superman Ultimate Flight at Six [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a chance to go to California next weekend, which is sort of a great opportunity&#8230;except nothing&#8217;s open yet. What gives, California?! At least I have another opportunity to go back in June. It certainly is an exciting year for California, though; here&#8217;s what we&#8217;ll have to look forward to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Superman Ultimate Flight at Six Flags Discovery Kingdom, a crazy new Premier coaster (&#8220;Late Spring&#8221;)</li>
<li>Transformers: The Ride, a new 3D ride based on the same technology as Spider-man, at Universal Hollywood (bet you thought it was Six Flags with that name) (sometime in May)</li>
<li>Lex Luthor, the world&#8217;s tallest drop tower, at Six Flags Magic Mountain (Late May)</li>
<li>Manta, a new Mack launched coaster (the first in the US), at SeaWorld San Diego (May 26th)</li>
<li>Cars Land and Main Street Rehab at California&#8217;s Adventure (June 15th)</li>
<li>New trains on Matterhorn at Disneyland &#8211; not necessarily a good thing, but Space Mountain in Florida turned out OK (actually, better) with new trains (June 15th)</li>
</ul>
<p>And of course, like the neglected puddle it is, California&#8217;s Great America has nothing new to share.</p>
<p>Any preferences on what you guys would like to see &#8220;under construction&#8221; pics of? I&#8217;m leaning toward Superman Ultimate Flight.</p>
<p>UPDATE: I couldn&#8217;t resist sharing a little more about California&#8217;s Great America, given my comment. Their newest two coasters in the park right now are a wild mouse (added in 2001, more than 10 years ago) the Taxi Jam kiddie coaster (added in 1999). Their most recent major coaster, Flight Deck, <em>was added in 1993, nearly 20 years ago</em>. They actually used to have two newer major coasters than that (Invertigo and Stealth), but both have since been <em>removed to other parks</em>. What says &#8220;we don&#8217;t value your park&#8221; more than moving its two newest major coasters to other parks? There was another park in the Cedar Fair chain that saw something similar happen &#8211; Geauga Lake. Thankfully, California&#8217;s Great America seems to have a brighter future than that, but here&#8217;s hoping that GCI project comes to fruition; it would certainly help the park feel more loved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=11</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 in &#8216;10, 5 to Ride from &#8216;09</title>
		<link>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=3</link>
		<comments>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>csladky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Off Track - Chris's Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fulllaunch.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inspired by Brian&#8217;s post, I thought I&#8217;d put together a list of the new coasters I was most excited about in 2010. It could also double as a list of the rides I&#8217;m most excited for. Thinking about this also brought to mind some of the rides from 2009 that I think are still new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspired by Brian&#8217;s post, I thought I&#8217;d put together a list of the new coasters I was most excited about in 2010. It could also double as a list of the rides I&#8217;m most excited for. Thinking about this also brought to mind some of the rides from 2009 that I think are still new and interesting enough to merit mention &#8211; and that neither of us have ridden yet. I chose to leave out stars people were familiar with, like <a href="http://rcdb.com/4147.htm">iSpeed</a>, <a href="http://rcdb.com/4150.htm">Fireball</a>, <a href="http://rcdb.com/3866.htm">Hollywood Rip, Ride, Rockit</a>, and <a href="http://rcdb.com/4274.htm" target="_self">El Toro</a> and focused on some of the more interesting, less ridden ones. Both lists are in ordered by excitement (most cool #1), though these are the &#8217;short lists&#8217;, so they&#8217;re all very notable. Follow the break to see the lists:</p>
<p><span id="more-3"></span><strong>5 in &#8216;10</strong></p>
<p><strong>1. </strong><strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/4520.htm">Intimidator 305</a></strong></p>
<p>Hopefully you&#8217;ve heard of this coaster. The first Intamin Giga Coaster since Millennium Force in 2000, it will be one of only 3 traditional-style, lift-hill coasters over 300 feet. Millennium Force is my reigning #1 coaster, and I&#8217;ve ridden most of the usual suspects. 305 has a significantly different layout that looks to solve some of the complaints about the giant in Ohio while keeping in the really great aspects. Specifically, they&#8217;ve added airtime and some tighter turns, but they&#8217;ve kept a low and fast layout. One other notable change is that the first drop goes right into a turn, which should result in a great speed sensation. The one potential chink in the armor is the restraints. Millennium Force enjoys only lap restraints (Intamin T-bars), but King&#8217;s Dominion has said 305 will be getting restraints with an over the shoulder component of some type. That might not seem like a big deal, but it certainly made more of a difference than I thought it would on Kingda Ka, and that&#8217;s not an uncommon sentiment. All considered, Â I think it has the potential to become a top-1o-or maybe even the favorite-coaster for many people &#8211; though a lot is riding on how those restraints affect the ride. This is definitely the most exciting and anticipated coaster for me since I&#8217;ve become an enthusiast.Â It&#8217;s also personally exciting because it&#8217;s in the US; this should be one we get to ride and cover.</p>
<p><strong>2. </strong><strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/8983.htm">Unknown Flying Coaster at World Joyland</a></strong></p>
<p>As you might know, I&#8217;m very fond of both flying coasters and unique, interesting coasters. This coaster will land firmly in both categories if it materializes as predicted. I&#8217;m still somewhat dubious about the details, but there&#8217;s rumors that RCDB got the inversions from B&amp;M at IAAPA. Assuming those inversions are correct, this ride will represent a radical departure from anything B&amp;M has done with a flying coaster before, and as such will present a unique experience. With B&amp;M&#8217;s strong reputation, I can&#8217;t wait to see what they&#8217;ve come up with. Unfortunately, there&#8217;s not too much more to say, as there&#8217;s still little known about this ride.</p>
<p><strong>3. </strong><strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/4485.htm">F1 Coaster</a></strong></p>
<p>The RCDB link for this isn&#8217;t very helpful; check outÂ <a href="http://onride.de/viewtopic.php?p=720660">here</a> for some pictures or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNiHpuy41W4">here</a> for the concept video. What will allegedly be the world&#8217;s fastest coaster starts with a launch (undoubtedlyÂ intense), but unlike the last two speed record breakers, it keeps going after that. A ground-hugging layout should keep the high speed going and really take advantage of that to make for an awesome sensation &#8211; and another world-class Intamin coaster. There&#8217;s something for everyone here, too &#8211; theyÂ added some bunny hills toward the end for the airtime fanatics. They even thought to add a midcourse brake run, so hopefully we won&#8217;t see some of the capacity problems that Intimidator 305 will experience.</p>
<p><strong>4. </strong><strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/8588.htm">Intimidator</a></strong></p>
<p>After my lackluster experience with Diamondback, you wouldn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be eagerly anticipating a B&amp;M hyper. However, I think this has potential to be a bit different. It&#8217;ll be tall, but pretty much the same height as Behemoth and Diamondback. What&#8217;s interesting to me here is the layout. It looks to me like this is a bit tighter and less reserved than is characteristic of B&amp;M, especially in their hypers. In addition to airtime, we also get some exciting twists like <a href="http://intimidator.carowinds.com/_upload/photo_gallery/construction/Picture110411.jpg">this one</a> and the transition you see in the upper left corner <a href="http://rcdb.com/8588.htm?p=24372">of this shot</a>. OK; admittedly, those are from the same element, and I could well be setting myself up for disappointment, but I think it has the potential to be a great ride. Also exciting is that this is another one we&#8217;ll actually be able to ride and cover.</p>
<p><strong>5. </strong><strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/4161.htm">Ring Racer</a></strong></p>
<p>This probably isn&#8217;t a very good ride. Let me repeat that &#8211; this probably isn&#8217;t a very good ride. Given my experience on <a href="http://rcdb.com/729.htm">Hypersonic</a>, I&#8217;m really hesitant to have any expectation of quality. S&amp;S did use a different track type (no more <a href="http://rcdb.com/729.htm?p=8308">I-beam</a>) and allegedly <a href="http://rcdb.com/4161.htm">new trains</a> (although the fact that they share the same seat arrangement and stupidly low 8-person-train-capacity makes me wonder). Â That layout screams boring at best and painful at worst. So, with all of these concerns, why is it in my top 5? Simple: fast and unique. Also, there is the possibility that S&amp;S will redeem their thrust-air line here, which I wouldn&#8217;t have predicted we&#8217;d see any more of before they announced this. One final thought is that I was expecting that I&#8217;d be putting this in the 2009 category, and it did operate below full potential a few times in 2009, but it hasn&#8217;t fully opened to the public yet &#8211; or reached its top speed, which is really the interesting part.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention: <a href="http://rcdb.com/8656.htm">Big Air</a></strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s unclear whether this coaster is open yet, so I couldn&#8217;t really put it in either category. Either way, credit to E-Da for actually trying to help Vekoma bring one of their <a href="http://www.vekoma.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=28&amp;Itemid=21">crazier concepts</a> to life. I certainly wouldn&#8217;t have trusted the engineers to get all of these mechanics right; it&#8217;s a pretty complex design, but I&#8217;m happy to see how it turns out on someone else&#8217;s money. I wish them the best of luck, and look forward to hearing about when this wacky coaster actually operates.</p>
<p><strong>5 to Ride from &#8216;09</strong></p>
<p><strong>1.Â <a href="http://rcdb.com/4074.htm">Blue Fire</a></strong></p>
<p>The first launched Mack coaster; it&#8217;s been getting great ratings, and it has very interesting <a href="http://rcdb.com/4074.htm?p=23197">seats</a> and <a href="http://rcdb.com/4074.htm?p=23374">restraints</a>. What&#8217;s not to like? It has a pretty good looking layout and even a <a href="http://rcdb.com/4074.htm?p=23373">smidge of theming</a>. It&#8217;s also one of the few new coasters being built with inversions and only a lap-restraint, but here&#8217;s hoping we&#8217;ll see more of them. That handle from the restraint still looks ridiculously goofy, though.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/4074.htm"></a></strong><strong>2.Â <a href="http://rcdb.com/4312.htm">Tranan</a></strong></p>
<p>If it weren&#8217;t for Blue Fire appearing so high in various rankings, this probably would have been number one. I have to admit, when I first saw this coaster as a concept, I never imagined it would see the light of day &#8211; especially given the mechanical disaster that was the first 4th Dimension coaster, which is clearly very related. Nevertheless, less than a year later, someone had bought one, and now it&#8217;s actually operational. I&#8217;m pleasantly surprised; this is certainly one of the more interesting and innovative designs we&#8217;ve seen recently. If you&#8217;re unfamiliar, descriptions won&#8217;t do it justice; check out the <a href="http://www.s-spower.com/coasters/freefly/freefly.php">official videos</a>.</p>
<p><strong>3. <a href="http://rcdb.com/4124.htm">Stingray</a></strong></p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;s no secret that I love flyers, and Stringray is one of the more interesting ones. It&#8217;s quite a departure from anything that&#8217;s been done so far, in particular the half of an outside loop (which can be seen near the lift in <a href="http://rcdb.com/4124.htm?p=22644">this picture</a> &#8211; and is an important step in proving it is possible to someone *cough*Brian*cough*). Given their past performance with vertical lifts (the ill-fated DÃ©jÃ -Vu series), I&#8217;m fairly impressed that this actually seems to be operating, although given its location, any details on downtime are pretty hard to come by. It&#8217;s a pity it&#8217;s somewhat obscure, because again, I&#8217;d love to see more experimentation with outside loops.</p>
<p><strong>4. <a href="http://rcdb.com/4075.htm?p=23164">Fluch von Novgorod</a> (or <a href="http://rcdb.com/4181.htm?p=23401">Anubis</a>)</strong></p>
<p>Two very cool new Gerstlaurer launched coasters came out in 2009. Both have nice layouts with steep vertical hills and fairly intense launches. While Anubis&#8217;s inversions look great, I have to hand it to Fluch for the very cool theming. Anubis also is notable for its more unique <a href="http://rcdb.com/4181.htm?p=23104">trains</a>, which deviate from the common Eurofighters but also have fewer seats. I&#8217;d love to get on either of these &#8211; or both.</p>
<p><strong>5. <a href="http://www.rcdb.com/4313.htm">Tornado</a></strong></p>
<p>This could be somewhat of a very make-or-break coaster&#8230;it&#8217;s a spinning coaster, and there&#8217;s only so much you can do with that, right? Two particular elements of this coaster are interesting to me: the launch at the top of the lift and the restraints. The launch is really amusing to me&#8230;why even bother with the lift? It&#8217;s certainly a unique, strange, interesting way to do it. <a href="http://www.thecoastercritic.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/intimidator-over-shoulder-straps.jpg">The restraints</a> areÂ yet another new Intamin over-the-shoulder design, and may be the ones we see end up on Intimidator 305&#8230; we shall see. I&#8217;m also not a fan of the current generation (as seen on <a href="http://rcdb.com/3570.htm?p=19564">Maverick</a> &#8211; although they admittedly were fine <a href="http://gallery.fulllaunch.com/main.php?g2_itemId=345">on</a> <a href="http://rcdb.com/3430.htm">Baco</a>), Â so I&#8217;m hoping this will be an improvement.</p>
<p><strong>6.Â <a href="http://rcdb.com/4225.htm">Mega-Lite</a></strong></p>
<p>Or <a href="http://rcdb.com/4220.htm">its sibling</a>. Alight, admittedly, I said only 5, and this layout and type were hardly new for 09. However, they&#8217;ve been getting fantastic rankings, and the POVs only seem to reinforce that. It&#8217;s a ride type I&#8217;d love to get on, and fortunately, based on current trends, one we&#8217;ll be seeing more of in the future.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention: </strong><a href="http://rcdb.com/4308.htm?p=23460"><strong>Mumbo Jumbo</strong></a></p>
<p>Someone call the Thrope fanboys because I&#8217;m mentioning this but notÂ <a href="http://rcdb.com/4162.htm">Saw</a>&#8230;but seriously, there are countless Eurofighters around, but there&#8217;s only 2 El Loco&#8217;s. The forces on these rides are undoubtedly quite different from nearly any other coaster out there, and that&#8217;s certainly interesting. These rides certainly live up to their model name (El Loco, or &#8220;crazy&#8221;). I&#8217;ve been there, done that with themed Eurofighters, thanks to<a href="http://rcdb.com/3609.htm"> Mystery Mine</a>, but I&#8217;m still eagerly anticipating getting my first taste of this type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulllaunch.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
